(What Consumers Need to Know for the 2026 Marketplace)
D. Kenton Henry – editor, agent, broker
As we approach the 2026 plan year, one of the biggest questions in individual and family health insurance is what will happen to Advance Premium Tax Credits (APTCs)—the subsidies that lower monthly premiums for millions of Marketplace enrollees.
Why This Is Happening
During the COVID era, Congress passed temporary legislation — most recently extended under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) — which made Marketplace subsidies more generous and available to more households. These enhanced subsidies are scheduled to expire at the end of 2025, unless Congress acts to extend them.
If they expire, the Marketplace will revert to pre-COVID subsidy rules, which means:
1. Lower income thresholds for subsidy eligibility
Some households who qualified for subsidies under the temporary rules will no longer qualify at all.
2. Smaller subsidies for many who remain eligible
People who received very large subsidies during 2021–2025 would see higher net premiums for 2026, even if their income has not changed.
3. The return of the “subsidy cliff”
Under pre-COVID rules, households with income even slightly above 400% of the Federal Poverty Level received no subsidy. The COVID-era rules removed that cliff. If not renewed, the cliff returns.
This is why some people are seeing early projections showing their 2026 premiums rising sharply.
Where Things Stand in Congress
Both parties publicly acknowledge that the expiration would lead to large premium increases for many families. As of today:
There is broad interest in finding a solution, but
No final legislation has been passed,
No guarantee exists that the enhanced subsidies will continue, and
Any resolution will likely be tied to larger budget negotiations.
In short: Congress is still debating it, and the outcome directly affects what consumers will pay for Marketplace coverage in 2026.
What Consumers Should Expect
Until Congress acts, the Marketplace must begin preparing 2026 rates under the assumption that the enhanced subsidies expire. This means:
Preliminary quotes may show dramatically higher net premiums
Some currently subsidized families may temporarily appear ineligible for assistance
Final 2026 subsidy amounts cannot be known until legislation is passed — if it is passed
It is important to remember that this may change, depending on Congressional action in the coming months.
Practical Guidance for Individuals and Families
Don’t panic if early projections show large increases.
Stay informed — subsidy rules may be extended or modified.
Review your 2026 options with a licensed, experienced broker who can calculate subsidies under both scenarios.
Update income estimates accurately during Open Enrollment; small changes can affect substantial tax credit differences.
Bottom Line
The enhanced ACA subsidies that helped make Marketplace coverage more affordable since 2021 are set to expire after 2025, and Congress has not yet determined whether they will be renewed. Until a resolution is reached, 2026 Marketplace premiums may appear significantly higher for many Americans.
I will continue to monitor developments closely and provide updates as soon as new information becomes available.
Additionally—
It has come to my attention that my clients have been told the First Health PPO network plan is being mistakenly interpreted by them as being an Affordable Care Act (ACA) compliant PPO network. As such, they incorrectly believe any and all of their pre-existing health conditions will be covered and that all preventive exams and medicine will be covered at no out-of-pocket cost to them. This is wrong and here is the truth, as confirmed by me and ChatGPT:
✅ 1. There are no ACA-compliant PPO plans available in Texas individual/family (On- or Off-Exchange)
Texas has not had a true ACA-compliant individual market PPO option for several years. All carriers (BCBSTX, Ambetter, United/Optum, Aetna CVS, Oscar, Cigna, Moda, etc.) offer only:
EPOs
HMOs
These networks limit out-of-network benefits and require referrals or tighter network management.
A PPO requires:
National or multi-state contracted provider access
True out-of-network benefits
No referral requirement
No carrier has offered this in the ACA individual Texas market since around 2017–2018.
✅ 2. Aetna is not selling ACA individual/family plans in Texas for 2026 (and has already exited)
Your clients may be confused because Aetna offers:
Medicare Advantage PPOs
Employer-based PPOs
First Health networks tied to group/other products
But Aetna does NOT offer ACA individual/family plans in Texas for 2026.
So if someone believes they have an “Aetna PPO” under an ACA plan, they are mistaken. It is either not an ACA plan, or they are misinterpreting the network type.
✅ 3. If their plan is marketed as “PPO-like,” it is almost certainly:
a) A short-term medical plan
These frequently use PPO networks—including Aetna’s First Health—but they are:
NOT ACA-compliant
Do NOT cover pre-existing conditions
Can cap benefits
Can deny claims based on underwriting
b) A health-sharing ministry
Often marketed as “PPO plans” because they use rented networks, but also:
Not insurance
Not regulated as insurance
No claim guarantees
No ACA protections
c) A fixed-benefit plan that uses First Health or MultiPlan PPO
Again:
Not insurance
No ACA protections
No out-of-pocket maximums
No guaranteed coverage
d) A direct primary care + medical indemnity bundle
These are sometimes misrepresented as “PPO plans,” but they are not.
✅ 4. How to confirm instantly whether the client is on ACA-compliant coverage
Ask for one of the following:
A) The name of the carrier.
If it’s not:
BCBSTX
Cigna
Ambetter
UnitedHealthcare (UHC Marketplace)
Aetna CVS (in some states, but NOT Texas 2026)
Moda
Oscar (until exit)
…then it’s almost certainly not ACA-compliant.
B) A copy of the Summary of Benefits & Coverage (SBC).
All ACA plans must include an SBC — short-term plans and sharing ministries do not.
C) Their monthly bill or ID card.
If it says things like:
First Health Network
MultiPlan PPO
PHCS PPO
Aetna PPO
United Healthcare Choice/Choice Plus PPO
…that is almost certainly a non-ACA plan.
✅ 5. Bottom line for you:
If you believe you they are on an ACA-compliant “Aetna PPO” for individual/family coverage:
You are not. No such product exists in the Texas ACA market. You are almost certainly on a short-term plan, health-sharing product, or fixed-benefit plan using a rented PPO network.
This is an excellent opportunity for ne to help you transition to true ACA coverage, where you will regain:
Pre-existing condition protection
Essential health benefits
No annual/lifetime caps
And – perhaps most importantly – Out-of-pocket maximum protection
Please feel free to call me with any questions you may have or for assistance in obtaining 2026 ACA compliant health insurance. I will make the quoting and application process go as quickly and smoothly as possible whether you quailify for a subsidy or not.
The Open Enrollment Period for a January 1 effective date ends December 15th. You have until January 15th to obtain an effective date of February 1.
D. Kenton Henry Office: 281-367-6565 Text my cell 24/7@ 713-907-7984 Email: Allplanhealthinsurance.com@gmail.com
By D. Kenton Henry Editor, Agent, Broker HealthandMedicareInsurance.com 11 September 2024
Welcome, fellow boomers and others blessed to have lived long enough to find yourself here. I believe you recognize that the information in my blog posts can contribute to this leg of our journey being the longest and most rewarding. I’m right here with you and doing my best to make it so for all of us. Coming changes in 2025 Medicare plans are significant, so please read this and feel free to take notes. They could impact you and probably will.
We will begin with what your Medicare Part B premium to Medicare for Out-Patient Care will go to: For those earning less than $105,000 your premium will go to $185.00 (up from $174.70) For those in the highest income bracket, earning greater than $500,000 your premium will go to $628.90 (from $594.00) For every income block in between, couples filing jointly, and what Part D premiums to Medicare will go to, please click on this link and scroll down: https://www.irmaacertifiedplanner.com/2025-irmaa-brackets/
An Annual Notice of Change (AOC) from your Medicare Part D prescription drug plan or a private insurer’s Medicare Advantage plan is due you. It will arrive in the United States mail and, per Medicare rules, by September 30th. So, like the pretty woman in the image above, open it and read it. It outlines how much your premiums, deductibles, and co-pays will differ in the coming year. Will your drugs be covered, and will your current drug plan even be available? We don’t yet know. Mutual of Omaha notified agents and brokers that it is withdrawing altogether from the Part Drug plan market beginning January 1. If you are currently with them or have any other plan that is exiting the marketplace, follow the instructions in the next paragraph.
According to eHealth, a mere 36% of those surveyed claim the AOC to be “readily understandable.” The author of the attached article recommends you spend at least 30 minutes reviewing it. However, if you finish this article, you can cut that time considerably. If you have finished all and still feel you are among the remaining (up to) 64%—please call me @ 281-367-6565.
This article is a follow-up to my last blog post on September 3rd. “MAJOR CHANGES IN MEDICARE PART D DRUG PLANS ARE COMING OUR WAY (what we know. and one thing we don’t know).” To read it, please click on this link. (if necessary, copy and paste it in your browser’s URLbox and hit enter):
Well, now we know more of the potential compromises mentioned or alluded to in that article. All of these are covered in detail in Feature Article 1 below.
The changes addressed here are largely because of the new $2,000 per year limit on Medicare Part D drug costs in 2025 (versus $8,000, plus 5% thereafter, in 2024). That leaves Medicare Part D insurance companies looking for ways to compensate for the additional costs shifting from you to them. Come January, you will meet a new deductible of up to $590 (from $545) for applicable drugs. Typically, your plan will apply this to brand-name drugs and not Tier 1 or Tier 2 generics.
Beyond that, the Gap, commonly referred to as the “donut hole” (in which you were previously responsible for 25% of your drug costs), has been eliminated entirely. You will have entered the “Initial Coverage” phase in which your elected drug plan will pay 65% of your applicable drug costs, and you will pay 25%. The Manufacturer (pharmaceutical company) will discount the remaining 10%. When you hit your maximum Out-of-Pocket (OOP) threshold of $2,000, you enter “Catastrophic Coverage”. At that point, your plan will pay 60%. Reinsurance (CMS, the Center for Medicare Services, i.e., the government) will pay 20%, and the Manufacturer will pay the remaining 20%. You will pay $0.
This, of course, sounds very well and good! And for those utilizing large quantities of drugs, or expensive drugs, this will indeed be of great benefit. But in what ways may the drug plans “compensate” for the additional costs they will bear? Much of such was referenced or alluded to above. However, please permit me to drill down on potential measures drug plans may take to offset their increased share of your drug cost. *(I am a Medicare Insurance product broker and not a C.P.A. As such, I will not address the impact on the taxpayer of their increased share of Medicare drug costs in this forum. wink. wink 😉
The drill down:
In addition to the higher deductible, higher premiums may be in store. But it could have been a lot worse. CMS did health insurance companies a favor with a “premium-stabilization” plan. In 2025, they will give them a subsidy in exchange for not “slapping members with exorbitant premium hikes. So, “what might have been a 40%, 50%, or higher premium increase may only be as high as 25%. Either way, it will be a sticker shock when some see how their premiums changed.” *(a paraphrase a quote in Feature Article 1)
The Kaiser Family Foundation says the average cost of a stand-alone Part D drug plan is $43. I have seen previews of premiums which will be $0, but others, have risen. In addition to your premium, co-pays for your drugs could go substantially higher. If your drug plan is obligated to charge you less for (or cover more of) a particular drug, are they simply going to charge you more for others?
And what about “Value Added Benefits” (VAB) available in some Medicare Advantage Plans? These include vision, hearing, and dental services. Other examples include acupuncture, bathroom safety devices, and wigs for hair loss. And what about your gym membership? Embedded dental insurance has been dramatically cut back or removed completely.
VAB are not covered by Original Medicare. Medicare Advantage has been able (often along with a $0 premium) to offer these things as an additional incentive to encourage enrollment in their plans. However, because you left Original Medicare and “assigned” the administration of your benefits and claims to the Advantage company when you enrolled, your plan can choose to provide these ancillary benefits that Original Medicare does not. Or they can choose to cover them no longer. This discretion is on their part because the provision of VAB benefits is not codified in law or per CMS regulation. Resultingly, they are not guaranteed. They are optional benefits that the plans have the right to withdraw at any time. I hope you can continue to “workout” at the gym, at your plan’s expense, in 2025 and beyond. But be prepared to purchase a home gym kit if you learn your membership is downgraded or your Advantage plan disappears entirely.
With no obligation, please feel free to contact me for clarification of these relevant issues and additional guidance in navigating the Medicare system and the changes referred to here. I’m in Medicare with you. I am a “Boomer” who has spent the better part of his life in the medical insurance market. For years, I have assisted individuals, families, and businesses in identifying and enrolling in health insurance plans that came as close as I could get them to fully meeting their medical insurance wants and needs.
To sum things up, I work for my clients. I work for you. Not the insurance company. I study, take their tests, and “certify” to represent their products each calendar year. I just completed certifying with approximately 14 companies in preparation for marketing their products in 2025. They do not pay to renew my licenses or my Errors and Omissions insurance, nor do they cover my office insurance and expenses. Neither they, nor anyone else, pay me wages or a salary. And that is great! I knew and understood those terms when I went out on my own. And that is precisely why I did it. I did not want to be beholden to the insurance company.
After becoming independent, the list of companies I was contracted with grew to over 40 during the 1990s. That number has changed as many of those companies went the way of the steam engine with “Obamacare” and all the red tape and regulations that come with it and remaining in the industry. But I persist. I remain positioned to provide you with virtually every available Medicare and health insurance product in your region.
In conclusion:
If you’re reading this, chances are you remember Jim Rockford (a private detective, portrayed by the actor the late James Garner) in his TV show, The Rockford Files (you can hear the opening music now, can’t you?). In the prelude to each episode, you see his cassette recording answering machine and hear the message, “This is Jim Rockford. At the tone, leave a message …”.
Should you get mine, please do the same. Or you may simply text me.
FORTUNE Richard Eisenberg Updated Mon, Aug 26, 2024
Why this year’s Medicare Annual Notice of Change will be vital reading for beneficiaries
In this article:
If you’re on Medicare, you’ll be getting one or two Annual Notice of Change letters in your mail or email this September about your 2025 coverage and costs. You may be tempted to ignore what looks like junk, as nearly a third of recipients do, according to an eHealth survey.
Don’t.
“So often, a person who is quite happy with their plan and doesn’t bother to look at their Annual Notice of Change then gets a nasty surprise in January” when the plan’s new costs and coverage kick in, says Danielle Roberts, author of 10 Costly Medicare Mistakes You Can’t Afford to Make and founding partner of Boomer Benefits, which sells Medicare policies.
What is an Annual Notice of Change?
An Annual Notice of Change from your Medicare Part D prescription drug plan or a private insurer’s Medicare Advantage plan lays out how much your premiums, deductibles, and co-pays will differ in the year ahead and whether the plan will even be offered. (Medigap plans don’t send these notices because they don’t change much year to year.)
An Annual Notice of Change from your Part D plan also says whether your prescriptions will be covered and, if so, how much you’ll pay. A Medicare Advantage Notice of Change will tell you if your doctors and hospitals will remain in the plan’s network.
While this information is always essential to make smart choices during Medicare’s eight-week open enrollment period (Oct. 15 – Dec. 7), experts say reading your Annual Notice of Change is especially important in 2024.
“There is an excellent chance that something is changing on your plan,” says Roberts. “This year, more than ever, we can expect big changes in the plans.”
Surprising effect of the $2,000 prescription drug cap
That’s largely due to a major Medicare change coming in 2025: the new $2,000 cap on out-of-pocket costs for prescriptions covered by a Part D plan.
Since Part D health insurers will be on the hook for more prescription costs due to the cap, they’ll be looking for ways to compensate.
That could mean higher premiums (currently $43 a month for stand-alone plans, on average, according to KFF), deductibles, and co-pays—possibly substantially higher than in 2024.
“I have been very, very concerned about what the $2,000 cap was going to do to Part D premiums,” says Roberts.
The prescription drug change in 2025 could also lead to your Part D plan no longer covering certain medications you take or raising prices of ones it will.
Medicare Advantage plans—some facing profit squeezes currently—often include Part D coverage, so they may respond to the $2,000 cap by trimming or eliminating benefits to keep their popular $0 premiums intact, experts expect.
As a result, your Medicare Advantage benefits that original Medicare can’t offer—such as dental, vision, hearing, and gym memberships—could be less attractive than in 2024, or possibly gone entirely.
“It really will be important to understand what’s changing in the coming year in my current plan and does the plan still fit?” says eHealth CEO Fran Soistman. “Does it still provide the value that it did when I elected to go in it in the first place?”
Reading and understanding the Notice of Change
Your Annual Notice of Change will tell you—if you can understand it.
Only 36% of Medicare beneficiaries surveyed by eHealth said their Annual Notice of Change letter is “readily understandable.”
Figure on spending about 30 minutes closely reading your Annual Notice of Change to see exactly what will be different in 2025 and whether you’ll want to switch plans or coverage next year as a result.
During open enrollment, you can switch from your current Part D plan to another, from your Medicare Advantage plan to another, from Medicare Advantage to original Medicare as well as from original Medicare to a Medicare Advantage plan.
But don’t feel compelled to switch plans just because your Annual Notice of Change says your premium will go up a little or a benefit will be trimmed slightly.
“If there’s a modest benefit decrease or premium increase, but they’re satisfied with what the carrier is providing, people shouldn’t make a change,” Soistman says.
However, he added, if a medication you take will no longer be covered or your physician or hospital won’t be in network, that’s an important change that may persuade you to switch coverage.
The Medicare Plan Finder on Medicare’s site will let you compare Part D and Medicare Advantage plans for 2025.
And, as Philip Moeller writes in the forthcoming revised edition of his book, Get What’s Yours for Medicare, if your Medicare Advantage plan won’t include your favorite doctor or hospital in its network in the year ahead, it’s legally obligated to work with you to identify other physicians or hospitals in its network that you’d like.
A new program to help avoid big premium hikes
To help prevent drastic Part D premium increases, the government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recently threw a bone to health insurers with a premium-stabilization plan.
Medicare will provide a special subsidy to those insurers for 2025 in exchange for avoiding slapping members with exorbitant premium hikes.
“It should take what might have been a 40%, 50%, or higher premium increase down to probably 25%,” says Soistman. “It’s still going to be a bit of sticker shock when some people see how their premiums changed.”
Roberts says, “I’m still somewhat concerned about premiums, but I feel a little better after the stabilization program announcement.”
Getting help if your Medicare plan will change
After reading your Annual Notice of Change, you may want to get help deciding on the right Medicare plans for 2025 and to understand the implications of coming changes to your plans.
You can ask a Medicare broker or agent for assistance; there’s a directory at the National Association of Benefits and Insurance Professionals site. The sooner you do, the better, since agents and brokers will be swamped near the end of open enrollment.
“At Boomer Benefits, we have to stop taking new requests after Thanksgiving,” says Roberts.
If one of your prescriptions won’t be covered by your Part D plan in 2025, call your doctor to see if another covered medication would be okay or if you should find a new plan that includes it, Roberts advises.
For information about Part D and Medicare Advantage plans without purchase recommendations, try yourState Health Insurance Assistance Program or visit Medicare’s site or call Medicare’s toll-free number.
More time for open enrollment?
Soistman believes all the changes coming to Part D and Medicare Advantage plans for 2025 will push back the arrival of the Annual Notice of Change documents to the last two weeks of September.
If so, this will give people with the plans less time than normal to read the notices before open enrollment.
The eHealth agency has asked the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to extend open enrollment by about five days to give beneficiaries, insurers, and Medicare brokers more time. Boomer Benefits favors the extension, too.
So far, the government hasn’t responded to eHealth’s proposal.
Could the 2025 open enrollment become Medicare’s equivalent of the Department of Education’s FAFSA financial-aid form fiasco of chaos and confusion?
“I don’t think it will be quite as drastic. I think it is going to be a year of change, though,” says Soistman. “And change is hard for people.” ********* Please follow me follow D. Kenton Henry @Https://HealthandMedicareInsurance.com
By D. Kenton Henry Editor, Broker, Agent 9 August 2024
For all Americans seeking to obtain or renew “Individual and Family” health insurance in 2025, there are (as always) certain changes to be anticipated.
Open Enrollment Period (OEP)—the period when all U.S. citizens may purchase health insurance for a January 1 effective date of the coming calendar year—runs from November 1st to December 15th. For those who, for whatever reason, want a February 1 effective date—the cutoff is January 15th. After that, a person must qualify for a Special Election Period (SEP). The most common of these is “loss of coverage through no fault of one’s own. During a SEP, an individual has 60 days to pick a plan. That plan will become effective on the first of the month after the date of the application.
To begin, let’s get the negatives out of the way.
THE NEGATIVE:
In 2025, ACA (Affordable Care Act) individual and family health insurance premiums are expected to increase by a median of 7%. This rise is driven by several key factors, including the increasing costs of hospital services, workforce shortages, and growing demand for high-cost specialty medications like GLP-1 drugs commonly used for weight loss and diabetes management (such as Ozempic). General inflation and healthcare provider consolidation are also contributing to these hikes.
Although most enrollees in ACA plans receive subsidies that will mitigate the impact of these increases, the cost burden on the federal government will grow as more funds will be needed to cover the subsidies. Insurers across the country are proposing premium increases that vary significantly, ranging from 5% to 10% on average, with some areas seeing rates fluctuate outside this range.
THE POSITIVE:
As we approach 2025, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) continues to evolve, aiming to address the shifting landscape of healthcare needs and to improve the accessibility and affordability of health insurance for individuals and families. The upcoming changes reflect ongoing efforts to enhance coverage, reduce costs, and ensure that more Americans have access to quality care. Here’s a comprehensive look at what you can expect from the ACA’s individual and family health insurance provisions in 2025.
1. Expanded Subsidies and Enhanced Affordability
One of the most significant changes coming in 2025 is the expansion of subsidies for health insurance premiums. Building on previous enhancements, such as those from the American Rescue Plan Act and the Inflation Reduction Act, the ACA will offer even more robust premium assistance. These expanded subsidies are designed to make health insurance more affordable for a broader range of income levels, particularly benefiting middle-income families who previously struggled with premium costs.
For 2025, the eligibility for premium tax credits will be extended, and the income thresholds for receiving assistance will be adjusted to account for inflation and rising living costs. This means that more individuals and families will qualify for financial help, reducing the burden of monthly premiums and making comprehensive coverage more accessible.
2. Increased Cost-Sharing Reductions
In addition to expanding premium subsidies, the ACA will also introduce enhanced cost-sharing reductions (CSRs). These reductions will lower out-of-pocket costs such as copayments, coinsurance, and deductibles for low- and moderate-income families. The aim is to make healthcare services more affordable at the point of care, not just in terms of monthly premiums.
The improved CSRs will be particularly beneficial for those who purchase coverage through the ACA marketplaces, ensuring that even the most essential health services, like prescription drugs and specialist visits, are within reach for more Americans.
3. Broader Coverage Options and Flexibility
The ACA will introduce more flexibility in plan design and coverage options starting in 2025. Health insurance plans available through the ACA marketplaces will offer a wider variety of coverage levels and network options, allowing individuals and families to choose plans that better match their specific needs and preferences.
For example, there will be more options for plans that cater to different health conditions or provide enhanced preventive care services. This diversification aims to address the diverse needs of the population and provide more tailored solutions to meet individual health requirements.
4. Enhanced Support for Mental Health and Substance Use Treatment
Recognizing the growing importance of mental health and substance use treatment, the ACA will place a stronger emphasis on coverage for these services in 2025. Insurance plans will be required to offer more comprehensive mental health benefits, including increased access to therapy, counseling, and substance use disorder treatment.
This change reflects a broader understanding of the integral role mental health plays in overall well-being and aims to reduce the barriers to accessing necessary mental health services.
5. Strengthened Protections Against Discrimination
The ACA will bolster protections against discrimination in health insurance. New regulations will ensure that insurers cannot deny coverage or charge higher premiums based on pre-existing conditions, gender, or other personal factors. Additionally, there will be greater oversight to ensure that insurance plans adhere to these non-discrimination policies.
These protections aim to create a more equitable healthcare system and to ensure that all individuals have fair access to health insurance, regardless of their personal circumstances.
6. Improvements to the Enrollment Process
The enrollment process for ACA health insurance plans will become more streamlined and user-friendly. In 2025, the federal and state-based marketplaces will introduce enhanced digital tools and support services to assist individuals and families with plan selection and enrollment. This includes improved online interfaces, more robust customer support, and clearer guidance throughout the enrollment period.
The goal is to reduce barriers to accessing coverage and to make it easier for people to navigate their options and secure the insurance that best fits their needs.
7. Emphasis on Preventive and Wellness Services
The ACA will continue to focus on preventive care and wellness services. In 2025, there will be increased incentives for health plans to cover preventive services without cost-sharing and to provide additional resources for wellness programs. This shift aims to encourage healthier lifestyles and early detection of potential health issues, ultimately reducing long-term healthcare costs and improving overall public health.
Conclusion:
The changes to the ACA’s individual and family health insurance provisions in 2025 represent a significant step forward in making healthcare more affordable, accessible, and equitable. With expanded subsidies, increased cost-sharing reductions, broader coverage options, and enhanced support for mental health, the ACA is set to offer even greater support to those in need. As these changes are implemented, individuals and families can expect a more supportive and responsive healthcare system that better meets their needs and helps them achieve better health outcomes.
*Please refer to Feature Articles 1 and 2 below the comments box for details on upcoming changes.
Whether you feel you qualify for an “Advanced Premium Tax Credit” (premium subsidy) or not, I can guide you through the process of determining such and enrolling in the plan of your choice for 2025. My years of experience specializing in medical insurance, including ever since ACA compliant plans became available on January 1, 2014, make the process go as quickly and smoothly as possible. Please contact me. There is no obligation to utilize my service and no charge for doing so. If you elect to acquire a policy I introduced you to, I only ask that you go through me to do so. You will be charged no more for the policy than if you walked through the front door of the insurance company and acquired it directly. I am currently appointed with every insurance company doing business in SE Texas; however, I represent you and your interests first and foremost.
THE KAISER FAMILY FOUNDATION (KFF) – The independent source for health policy research, polling, and news.
The independent source for health policy research, polling, and news.
Tammie Smith August 5th, 2024
Marketplace Insurers are Proposing a 7% Average Premium Hike for 2025 and Pointing to Rising Hospital Prices and GLP-1 Drugs as Key Drivers of Costs
ACA Marketplace insurers are proposing a median premium increase of 7% for 2025, similar to the 6% premium increase filed for 2024, according to a new KFF analysis of the preliminary rate filings. Insurers’ proposed rate changes – most of which fall between 2% and 10% – may change during the review process.
Although the vast majority of Marketplace enrollees receive subsidies and are not expected to face these added costs, premium increases generally result in higher federal spending on subsidies. The justifications insurers provide for these premium changes also shed light on what is driving health spending more broadly.
Insurers cite growing health care prices – particularly for hospital care – as a key driver of premium growth in 2025, as well as growing use of weight loss and other specialty drugs, according to KFF’s examination of publicly-available documents.
This year, increases in the prices insurers are paying for medical care tend to affect premiums more than growth in the utilization of care. Insurers say workforce shortages and hospital market consolidation, which can put upward pressure on health care costs and prices, are increasing 2025 health insurance premiums.
Meanwhile, growing demand for Ozempic, Wegovy, and other costly GLP-1 drugs, which are used to treat diabetes and obesity, is increasing prescription drug spending.
The full analysis and other data on health costs are available on the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, an online information hub dedicated to monitoring and assessing the performance of the U.S. health system.
One way insurers seek to control costs is to limit the size of the physician networks serving their plans. Providers agree to lower fees and other terms with insurers in order to be included in one or more of the networks they offer. Insurers then either limit coverage to services provided by network providers or encourage enrollees to use network providers through lower cost sharing. Reducing the number of providers in-network can effectively reduce plan costs, but it also limits enrollees’ choices, increases wait times, and can complicate the continuity of care for those switching plans. Enrollees receiving care from out-of-network providers often face coverage denials or substantially higher out-of-pocket expenses. These factors highlight how the size and composition of provider networks impact access to care and the financial protection insurance provides enrollees.
The breadth of provider networks in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplaces has been the subject of significant policy interest. Insurers often compete aggressively to be among the lowest-cost plans, potentially leaving enrollees with poor access. According to the 2023 KFF Survey of Consumer Experiences with Health Insurance, one in five (20%) consumers with Marketplace plans reported that in the past year, a provider they needed was not covered by their insurance, and nearly one in four (23%) said a provider they needed to see that was covered by their insurance did not have appointments available. Enrollees with Marketplace coverage were more likely than those with employer coverage to face these challenges. While the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) establishes minimum standards for the adequacy of provider networks for Marketplace plans, insurers retain considerable flexibility in how they design networks and how many providers they include. As a result, the breadth of plan networks varies considerably within counties, presenting challenges for consumers who need to select a plan with little information on the network breadth of their options.
This brief examines the share of doctors participating in the provider networks of Qualified Health Plans (QHPs) offered in the individual market in the federal and state Marketplaces in 2021, and how network breadth affected costs for enrollees. The analysis uses data on the physician workforce, from 2021, matching that to provider networks in marketplace plans from the same year. Doctors filing Medicare Part B claims in or near each county are considered to be part of the active workforce available to Marketplace enrollees. Only doctors filing a claim and therefore known to have engaged in patient care in 2021 were included. The share of local physicians participating in a network is a rough measure of how much access enrollees have; depending on the number of providers in the area and the workloads of those physicians, enrollees in plans with similar breadths may face different wait times to book appointments. The share of local physicians participating in-network distinguishes whether enrollees have a broad or narrow choice of local doctors. Those in plans including a small share of doctors have fewer options when trying to find a provider with available appointments. See the Methods section for more details.
Key Findings
On average, Marketplace enrollees had access to 40% of the doctors near their home through their plan’s network, with considerable variation around the average. Twenty-three percent of Marketplace enrollees were in a plan with a network that included a quarter or fewer of the doctors in their area, while only 4% were in a plan that included more than three-quarters of the area doctors in their network.
Some of the narrowest network plans were found in large metro counties, where enrollees on average had access to 34% of doctors through their plan networks. Marketplace enrollees in Cook County, IL (Chicago) and Lee County, FL (Fort Myers) were enrolled in some of the narrowest networks (with average physician participation rates of 14% and 23%, respectively). Plans in rural counties tended to include a larger share of the doctors in the area, though rural counties had fewer doctors overall relative to the population compared to large metro counties.
On average, more than one-quarter (27%) of actively practicing physicians were not included in any Marketplace plan network.
On average, Silver plans with higher shares of participating doctors had higher total premiums. Compared to plans where 25% or fewer of doctors participated in-network, those with participation rates between 25% and 50% cost 3% more while those with participation rates of more than 50% cost 8% more. (Silver plans are midlevel plans in terms of patient cost-sharing and are particularly significant because they are the benchmark for federal premium subsidies.)
More than 4 million enrollees (37% of all enrollees) lived in a county in which the two lowest-cost Silver plans included fewer than half of the doctors in the area and a broader plan was available. In order for these enrollees to enroll in the cheapest Silver plan that included at least half the doctors, they would have needed to spend an additional $88 per month.
How Broad are Marketplace Plan Physician Networks?
On average, enrollees in the ACA Marketplaces had access to 40% of the doctors near their homes through their plan’s network. This share was similar for pediatric and non-pediatric doctors.
A quarter of enrollees were in plans where fewer than 26% of the local doctors participated in their plan’s network, while another quarter were in plans where at least 54% of local doctors participated.
There is no formal definition of what constitutes a narrow network plan. Some researchers have labeled plans covering fewer than a quarter of the physicians in an area as narrow. Under this definition, 23% of Marketplace enrollees were in a narrow network plan. About seven in ten enrollees (70%) were in a plan that included half or fewer of the doctors near their home. Only 4% of enrollees were in a plan that included at least three-quarters of local doctors, and 1% of enrollees were in a plan that included at least 85% of local doctors.
How Broad Are Plan Networks for Primary Care and Physician Specialties?
Even a plan with a relatively large share of local doctors participating in its network may not have enough doctors in different specialties to meet the needs of plan enrollees. In particular, enrollees with chronic conditions may look for plans that include their doctors across multiple specialties.
Primary Care Physicians: Marketplace enrollees, on average, had plan networks that included 43% of the primary care doctors in their area. A quarter of Marketplace enrollees had plan networks that included fewer than 25% of primary care doctors. More than half a million Marketplace enrollees were in a plan with fewer than 50 in-network primary care doctors near their homes. As is the case for physician networks overall, primary care physician networks tended to be narrower in large metro counties, where the average enrollee had a plan network that included 35% of local primary care doctors. While primary care doctors account for a smaller share of spending than specialists, they play an important role in insurers’ network design either by acting as gatekeepers to specialty care and referring patients to specialists.
Specialists: Marketplace plan networks tended to include a larger share of practicing medical and surgical specialists than primary care physicians. The average Marketplace enrollee had a plan network that included 52% of medical specialists and 53% of surgical specialists in their area; however, one-quarter of Marketplace enrollees had access to fewer than 34% of the medical specialists and 32% of the surgical specialists. On average, Marketplace enrollees had plan networks that included 21% of hospital-based physicians, which may include anesthesiologists, radiologists, pathologists, and emergency physicians.1 Information on additional specialties is available in the appendix.
Psychiatrists: Marketplace networks for psychiatrists were smaller. On average, Marketplace enrollees had access to 37% of the psychiatrists in their area through their plan.2 Twenty-five percent of Marketplace enrollees were in a plan that included 16% or fewer of the psychiatrists near their homes.
How Does Network Breadth Vary by Location?
Network breadth varied based on where plans were offered, with those in urban areas having lower physician participation rates, on average. In 2021, CMS designated county types based on their population and density; there are 78 Large Metro counties and 723 Metro counties. Most Marketplace enrollees lived in one of these urban county designations, including 38% in Large Metro counties and 48% in Metro counties.
Urban Counties: While Large Metro and Metro counties had more doctors, smaller shares of them participated in Marketplace plan networks compared to doctors in more rural areas. Marketplace enrollees in Large Metro counties, on average, had access to 34% of the doctors in their area through their plan networks, with a quarter enrolled in a plan whose network included fewer than 23% of local doctors. Marketplace enrollees in Metro counties, on average, had access to 42% of local doctors through their plan networks, while those in Rural counties, on average, had access to 52% of local doctors.
The 30 counties with the highest enrollment in the Marketplaces collectively represented 34% of all Marketplace enrollees and 21% of the U.S. population. These counties are typically urban and disproportionately in states that have not expanded Medicaid under the ACA.3
There was significant variation in network breadth across these 30 counties. Differences in average network breadth across these counties are the result of a combination of factors including the physician workforce, market characteristics, and insurer strategies. With networks with low provider participation rates, most Marketplace enrollees in Cook County, IL (Chicago) had access to fewer than one in six (14%) doctors in their area on average. Similarly, Marketplace enrollees in Lee County, FL (Fort Myers) and Fort Bend County, TX (outside Houston) had in-network access to less than a quarter of local doctors (23% and 24%, respectively). In contrast, some larger US cities had broader networks than those available in Houston and Chicago. For example, enrollees in Middlesex County, MA (outside Boston), Gwinette County, GA (outside Atlanta), and Travis County, TX (Austin) had in-network access to almost half of the doctors in their areas on average (46%, 46%, and 49%, respectively).
In 2021, 14% of Marketplace enrollees (1.6 million people) lived in four counties: Los Angeles, CA; Miami-Dade, FL; Broward, FL (Fort Lauderdale); and Harris, TX (Houston). On average, enrollees in each of these counties had in-network access to less than 4-in-10 local doctors (25%, 36%, 38%, and 25%, respectively).
High physician participation rates may not result in meaningful choice if there are few doctors in the area in the first place. For example, enrollees in Hidalgo County, TX (McAllen), on average, had access to 61% of local doctors through their plan networks, but this may have reflected chronic shortages in the number of practicing doctors in the county.4
Rural Areas: On average, Marketplace enrollees in Rural counties had access to about half (52%) of local doctors through their plan networks, higher than the average in more urban counties. The higher provider participation rates in rural areas, however, need to be considered in the context of the small number of primary care doctors and specialists practicing in these areas. For example, 2.9 million Marketplace enrollees in Rural counties had fewer than 10 dermatologists in their local area, 2.5 million had fewer than 10 gynecologists, and 1.7 million had fewer than 10 cardiologists in their plan networks. In some cases, these providers may already have full panels, and an enrollee’s choice may be even more limited than the number of physicians who accept the plan.
County Demographics: On average, Marketplace enrollees living in counties with a higher share of people of color had narrower networks than counties with a smaller share.5 The quarter of Marketplace enrollees living in the counties with the highest share of people of color had access to 34% of doctors in-network, on average, compared to 42% in counties with a smaller share of people of color. This difference may reflect the higher concentration of people of color in large metro counties, where plans typically had narrower networks.
How Much Choice Do Consumers Have Over Networks in the County Where They Live?
Provider networks vary within counties, meaning that individuals shopping for a Marketplace plan may have the option to enroll in plans with vastly different network breadths. In 2021, 70% of enrollees (nearly 8 million people) lived in a county where one or more plans covered fewer than a quarter of the doctors in the area. Among these enrollees, nearly 4.3 million (54%) also had the opportunity to enroll in a plan that included more than half the doctors in the area.
In the 30 counties with the most enrollment, enrollees could choose from about 8 distinct plan networks, on average. Even within the same county, enrollees may have access to vastly different shares of physicians in-network. For example, in Lee County, FL (Fort Myers), a quarter of Marketplace enrollees were enrolled in plans with networks that included fewer than 5% of local doctors, while a quarter were enrolled in plans with networks that included more than 45%. Similarly, in Travis County, TX (Austin), a quarter of Marketplace enrollees were enrolled in a plan with a network that included fewer than 36% of local doctors, while a quarter were enrolled in plans that included at least 70%. Consumers in these counties have the opportunity to enroll in plans with vastly different physician networks but often face higher premiums to do so. (See section “How is Network Breadth Related to Plan Premiums?” for details.)
Access to a “Broad” Network Plan: A large share of Marketplace enrollees (91%) lived in a county in 2021 where they could not choose a plan with a network that included at least 75% of doctors in their areas. Among the 30 counties with the most Marketplace enrollment, only two—Middlesex County, MA (outside Boston) and Hidalgo County, TX (McAllen)—had at least one plan network choice with a physician participation rate of 75% or more. In most cases, the broadest Marketplace plan network offered in these 30 counties was much narrower than this. For example, the physician participation rate for the broadest Marketplace plan network offered was 22% in Cook County, IL (Chicago), 38% in Hillsborough County, FL (Tampa), and 40% in Maricopa County, AZ (Phoenix). In these counties, shoppers were unable to enroll in a plan that covered at least half of the doctors in their community, even if they were willing and able to pay more.
Doctors Not Participating in Any Marketplace Network: Some doctors did not participate in any Marketplace plan network in 2021. On average, 27% of actively practicing physicians who submitted Medicare claims were not included in any Marketplace plan network offered to enrollees that year. This means that people transitioning to a Marketplace plan from another coverage source may not have been able to find any plan that included their doctor. In some counties, a much higher share of doctors did not participate in any Marketplace network, including Cook County, IL (Chicago), where 60% of doctors did not participate in any Marketplace plan networks, Dallas County, TX (36%), and Lee County, FL (Fort Myers) (41%).
How Visible Are Differences in Network Breadth to Plan Shoppers?
The difficulty of selecting an appropriate plan for a consumer’s health needs is heightened by the tremendous number of choices in many counties. The average Marketplace consumer had a choice of more than 58 plans (including 23 Silver plans) in 2021, a number that has since grown.6
Plan choices can involve different provider networks. For example, in Harris County, TX (Houston), consumers in 2021 had a choice of 87 plans that used seven different provider networks, with physician participation rates that ranged from 9% to 52%. However, these network differences are largely invisible to consumers. The lack of consumer tools to evaluate and measure plan networks can make it more challenging to choose a plan. Other than in a limited pilot operating in two states (Tennessee and Texas), the only tool available for HealthCare.gov consumers to evaluate a plan’s network is to search for individual providers, one by one, in directories, which may not always be up to date.
Further complicating the challenges of selecting plans, the marketing names of plans offered by the same insurer using different provider networks do not clearly indicate network differences. For example, AmeriHealth of New Jersey offers multiple Silver plans in Camden County, NJ. The narrow plan was marketed as “IHC Silver EPO AmeriHealth Advantage” (with a physician participation rate of 40%), while the broader network Silver plan was marketed as “IHC Silver EPO Regional Preferred” (with a physician participation rate of 74%). Based on these names, shoppers may not be able to discern that these plans had different networks with very different participation rates.
Shoppers can also search by plan type. The vast majority of Marketplace enrollees (84%) were in HMO or EPO plans in 2021, which have closed networks that generally do not cover non-emergency services provided outside of their provider network. A smaller share of Marketplace enrollees were in PPO plans (13%) and POS plans (4%), which provide some coverage for out-of-network care. The cost for such care can be quite expensive because out-of-network providers can sometimes balance bill and cost sharing for their services is typically higher and not subject to the annual out-of-pocket maximum.
Marketplace consumers seeking access to a broader choice of physicians and who have the choice of a PPO plan might assume such plan networks are analogous to the broad PPO networks offered to many in the employer market. On average in 2021, Marketplace enrollees who signed up for PPO plans had access to 53% of local doctors through their plan networks, compared to 37% for those enrolled in HMOs and 38% for those enrolled in EPO plans. However, plan type is not necessarily reflective of network breadth. In almost half (46%) of counties with both a PPO and either an HMO or EPO Marketplace plan, at least one HMO or EPO plan had a broader network than a PPO plan. Many Marketplace enrollees also did not have the option to choose a PPO plan: 60% of enrollees lived in a county in which only closed-network (HMO and/or EPO) plans were available.
Marketplace plans are categorized into metal levels based on the overall level of cost sharing required by the plans (deductibles, copays, etc.). In 2021, enrollees in Bronze, Silver, and Gold plans had access to similar shares of physicians in their areas (41%, 39%, and 44%, respectively). This is the result of issuers utilizing the same networks across metal levels within a county. In only 1% of counties did an insurer’s broadest Silver plan use a different network than its broadest Bronze plan.
HealthCare.gov has not yet widely released a consumer assistance tool to aid shoppers in filtering options by network breadth. Since 2017, CMS has operated a limited pilot with information on network breadth for consumers in Tennessee and Texas.7 Under this network transparency pilot, CMS provides measures of plan network breadth for hospitals, primary care providers, and pediatricians as an aid to Marketplace shoppers in those states. CMS calculates a participation rate by determining the share of providers participating in any Marketplace networks in the area. CMS then categorizes plan networks as “Basic” (0%-29%), “Standard” (30%-69%), or “Broad” (70%+), based on how many physicians participate in at least one QHP network. Whereas the denominator used throughout this analysis is physicians who submitted claims to Medicare, the CMS tool only considers providers that participate in Marketplace plans. Therefore, even plans with narrow networks in areas where most doctors do not participate in Marketplace plans could be labeled “standard” or “broad” using this method. For example, whereas 90% of physicians in Travis County, TX (Austin) who take Medicare participated in at least one Marketplace plan in 2021, only 64% of doctors in Dallas County, TX did. Therefore, a plan covering a quarter of all the available doctors in both counties would be considered a “basic” plan in Travis County, TX but a “standard” plan in Dallas County.
Generally, the method used in the CMS “network transparency” tool does not seem to facilitate comparing plan networks across counties and may exaggerate the breadth of plan networks, potentially leading some consumers to believe that their plan includes a larger share of local providers than it actually does. Under the CMS pilot method, only 16% of Marketplace enrollees in 2021 were enrolled in a plan that would be considered “basic”; this compares to 33% of Marketplace enrollees would be considered to be in a basic plan if the definition of local doctors used in this paper were applied.
Network Breadth by Plan Insurer
Marketplace shoppers may consider who the insurer is when making inferences about plan networks.
Blue Cross and/or Blue Shield (BCBS) plans are sponsored by a mixture of for-profit and tax-exempt insurers. While these companies are run independently, they are affiliated through an association, and many share a common heritage. In many states, the BCBS affiliates are the largest insurers participating in the Marketplace and may in some cases also be the largest insurers or administrators for employer-sponsored coverage as well. On average, enrollees in BCBS Marketplace plans in 2021 had access to 49% of doctors in their areas through their plan networks, a larger share than enrollees in plans offered by other insurers (35%).8 Even so, BCBS Marketplace plan networks, on average, excluded about half of the doctors available to those in traditional Medicare. Further, there was considerable variation in participation rates by doctors among plans sponsored by BCBS insurers, sometimes even within the same county. For example, in Wayne County, MI (Detroit), the Blue Care Network and Blue Cross/BlueShield plan network participation rates ranged from 20% to 59% across plan options. Similarly, in Camden County, NJ, Independence Blue Cross offered two networks, with physician participation rates of 40% and 74%. Florida Blue in Miami-Dade County, FL offered multiple plan networks with participation rates ranging from 25% to 51%.
Insurers Also Participating in Medicaid Managed Care: Insurers with a large presence in the Medicaid managed care organization (MCO) market also have a solid footprint in the Marketplaces. Overall, the breadth of Marketplace plan networks sponsored by MCO insurers was similar to that of insurers overall (41% vs. 40%, respectively).9 One of the largest MCOs that expanded into the Marketplaces is Centene Corporation, which sponsors plans under Ambetter, Health Net, and other brand names. The average participation rate for doctors in plan networks offered by Centene was lower than the overall Marketplace average (33% vs. 40%). Molina, another major MCO insurer offering Marketplace plans, had an average physician participation rate of 35% in its plan networks.
Integrated Delivery Systems: Integrated delivery systems, such as Kaiser Permanente, Geisinger Health Plan, and the Chinese Community Health Plan, institute a different approach to network design. Under these plans, health care financing and delivery are conducted by the same organization. Providers are typically employees of the plan or an affiliated medical group, and these plans generally do not cover non-emergency care provided by doctors outside of the network. Although enrollees in these plans may not have a wide choice of physicians in the area, these integrated models strive to improve access through care coordination and may be less complex for patients to navigate which providers are in and out of their networks. Enrollees in Kaiser plans, by far the largest integrated delivery system, on average, had access to about one in five (19%) doctors in their area. Of note, the breadth of Kaiser physician networks does not lower the overall Marketplace average substantially because only 7% of Marketplace enrollees nationally were enrolled in Kaiser plans.
Non-profit Insurers: On average, Marketplace enrollees covered by plans sponsored by non-profit insurers in 2021 had in-network access to 43% of the doctors in their areas, compared to 38% for those covered by for-profit insurers. Excluding enrollees in Kaiser health plans, enrollees covered by non-profit insurers had access to 47% of local doctors on an in-network basis on average.
How is Network Breadth Related to Plan Premiums?
On average, Silver plans with higher shares of participating doctors had higher total premiums. When compared to plans where fewer than 25% of doctors participated in-network, those with participation rates between 25% and 50% cost 3% more while those with participation rates of more than 50% cost 8% more. While other factors also contribute to plan premiums, including the breadth of hospital networks and the plan design, narrow physician networks were associated with meaningfully lower total costs. The average total premium for a 40-year-old enrolled in a Silver Marketplace plan in 2021 was $466 a month. For these enrollees to sign up for a Silver plan that included more than 50% of area physicians, their premiums would have increased $37 per month. The statistical model used to estimate these premium differences is described in the methods.
Enrollee Cost to Purchase a Broader Plan
Consumers with private health insurance generally consider the breadth of provider networks very important when choosing a plan, yet many remain price-sensitive when selecting plans with higher costs. A 2019 KFF/LA Times survey found that 36% of adults with employer coverage said the cost of the plan (premiums and cost sharing) was the main reason they chose their plan, while 20% cited the choice of providers.
One way to illustrate how the cost of broader plans is passed on to consumers is to consider the counties where enrollees face higher premiums for a broader plan. Most (90%) of Marketplace enrollees receive a tax credit to offset all or part of the cost of the monthly premium. The size of the premium tax credit available to enrollees is based on both household income and the cost of the benchmark plan, defined as the second-lowest-cost Silver plan. ACA enrollees are responsible for paying the entire amount between the cost of the benchmark plan and a higher-cost plan. Enrollees in counties where the benchmark plans have relatively low physician participation rates may need to pay a significant amount to enroll in a broad network plan.
Among Marketplace enrollees, 74% percent, or 8.5 million enrollees, were in a county where the two lowest-cost Silver plans had fewer than 50% of physicians participating in their networks. Of these, about half, or 4.3 million enrollees, did not have a Silver plan available to them that included at least half of the local physicians in its network; 4.2 million enrollees did have at least one such plan available to them. For those 4.2 million people, the average additional cost to enroll in a Silver plan with at least half the local doctors participating was $88 (for a 40-year-old).
One in five Marketplace enrollees (19%, or 2 million enrollees) lived in a county where the two lowest-cost Silver plans included fewer than 25% of local physicians in-network. Fifty percent of these enrollees, or 1 million enrollees, lived in a county where at least one plan included at least half the doctors. Among these enrollees, the cost to enroll in a plan with at least half the local doctors would have cost $95 more than the benchmark plan each month.
Implications for Consumers and Potential Federal Efforts to Increase Access to Care
Having a plan with a narrow network increases the chances that an enrollee receives care out-of-network, either inadvertently (e.g., receiving care from an out-of-network provider they did not choose at an in-network facility), or because they are unable to find an in-network physician at the time and place they need. It can also have consequences for enrollees’ ability to seek care in a timely fashion and their health. The 2023 KFF Survey of Consumer Experiences with Health Insurance found that 20% of adults with Marketplace coverage said that in the past year, a particular doctor or hospital they needed was not covered by their insurance. Among Marketplace enrollees who experienced this problem, 34% said that needed care was delayed, 34% said they were unable to get needed care, and 25% experienced a decline in health status.
Additionally, going out-of-network can be costly for enrollees. Enrollees using out-of-network providers may face higher cost sharing and balance billing if the services provided are not regulated by the No Surprises Act. Among those who indicated experiencing a network adequacy problem in the consumer survey, almost half (47%) said they ended up paying more out of pocket for care than expected, including 22% who said the additional cost was $500 or more.
Some have suggested that the design of the Marketplace encourages insurers to offer narrower networks compared to those included in employer plans in order to keep premiums down. Employers use health benefits to attract and retain workers and have an incentive to create broader networks that appeal to their workforce. One analysis found that primary care networks for large group plans were 25% larger than those found on the Marketplaces.10 The higher prevalence of narrow network plans corresponds to a greater share of enrollees facing challenges finding in-network providers. The 2023 KFF Survey of Consumer Experiences with Health Insurance found that adults with Marketplace coverage were more likely than those with employer-sponsored health insurance to report that a particular doctor or hospital they needed was not covered by their insurance (20% vs. 13%) (Figure 14). Additionally, 34% of Marketplace enrollees in fair or poor health reported that a particular doctor or hospital they needed was not covered by their plan, nearly two times more than those with an employer plan (16%). Similarly, a forthcoming KFF analysis of the 2022 National Health Interview Survey found that challenges finding doctors led some adults to delay or skip care (Appendix Figure 7). Those with non-group coverage, such as Marketplace plans, were twice as likely as those with employer plans to indicate that they had delayed or skipped care in the past year because they couldn’t find a doctor who accepted their plan (7% vs. 3%). Among those who visited a hospital or emergency room during the past year, 11% of non-group enrollees reported skipping or delaying care, compared to 5% of those with employer coverage.
Even still, network breadth is only one component of access to care and may not always gauge how well enrollees are served. There are many aspects consumers consider when selecting a plan. This analysis examines network breadth but does not address other standards that health plans, physician networks, and physicians are required to meet. Enrollees in plans with broad networks may still face challenges scheduling appointments and considerable wait times. For some specialties, such as psychiatry, workforce shortages make it hard for enrollees to find providers even in plans that include a broad swath of physicians. Workforce shortages in many rural areas mean that even if a plan has a broad provider network, there still may be an insufficient number of providers to meet the needs of that community. Furthermore, many enrollees face additional challenges using their plan, including stringent prior authorization requirements.
Similarly, a plan with a narrow network—measured as the share of physicians in the area participating—may still provide adequate access to care, just not necessarily with a broad choice of providers. States use a range of network adequacy rules, with many requiring the inclusion of different types of providers, but only ten evaluate wait times to determine if a network meets minimum standards. The ACA requires that Marketplace plans maintain networks sufficient in number and types of providers for the purpose of ensuring that all services will be accessible without unreasonable delay. Currently, federal network adequacy standards require that plans provide access to at least one in-network provider for 90% of plan enrollees living within certain time/distance thresholds (for example, in large metro areas, no more than 10 minutes or 5 miles from a primary care provider, or no more than 30 minutes or 10 miles from an oncologist.) Although these standards measure geographic proximity to in-network care, they do not measure network breadth. Additionally, starting in 2025, federal Marketplace plans will be required to meet maximum appointment wait-time standards (e.g., no more than a 15-calendar day wait for routine primary care appointments or 30 days for non-urgent specialty care appointments).
A central challenge in analyzing network breadth is the quality of available data. The inclusion of so-called “phantom providers”—physicians listed in the network but who are not actually available to plan enrollees at the location or in the specialty they are listed—may increase the apparent breadth of plan networks without actually increasing access to care. Federal laws and regulations require Marketplace plans to publish online an up-to-date and complete provider directory. However, CMS has found high rates of incomplete and inaccurate information in these directories. Additionally, the No Surprises Act Improvements in plan directory data would facilitate regulation and decrease the burden on consumers comparing and using the plan. In 2022, CMS solicited public comment on establishing a national provider directory that private plans could use as a database for their own plan directories. Further action on this proposal is still pending, but this could improve available information about the landscape of available providers, allowing for the development of improved consumer information about provider ratios that show the share of practicing area providers (overall and by specialty) included in the provider network of each QHP.
TIME IS RUNNING OUT FOR A JANUARY 1 EFFECTIVE DATE!
Op-ed by D. Kenton Henry Editor, Broker 26 November 2021
In September, I learned Aetna and Unitedhealthcare would be reentering the Texas ACA Underage 65 health insurance market for the first time since 2015. Since then, BlueCross BlueShield has been the only “household name,” a large, financially sound insurance company in the southeast Texas market. This was most welcome news, and I was hopeful these additional peer companies would allow my clients and fellow Texans access to more doctors and hospitals. Finding my client’s preferred doctors and hospitals in a plan network has been my client’s and my greatest challenge since the departure of all PPO network options six years ago. Alas, the hoped-for provider expansion in 2022, at this point, has failed to materialize. From 2015 into 2021, the St. Lukes Hospital system has been the only major hospital system participating in most insurance companies’ HMO networks. Such will remain the case for 2022.
Additionally, the entry of Bright Insurance Company (for the first time) doesn’t even appear to do that. They will limit their policyholder’s access to hospitals will be limited to smaller HCA local community hospitals. At least for the time being.
Doctors have practicing privileges at one or more hospitals. Of course, it follows that when an insurance company has fewer hospitals in their network, they will have fewer participating doctors. And so it seems. Only one health insurance company in the southeast Texas ACA health insurance market allows its clients access to the three major hospital systems in the area. Those hospitals are St. Luke’s, Memorial Hermann, and Houston Methodist. And then, only if you acquire their more expensive Silver or Gold plans.
However, there is a bit of good news for all Americans in the “Individual and Family” health insurance market. The federal government’s American Rescue Plan has increased the amount of Advance Premium Tax Credit (subsidy) and Cost Sharing Reduction (reduction of deductibles, copays, and coinsurance) available to a household. It also expanded the eligibility for these subsidies. As the feature article below explains, this will qualify more people for both types of savings.
Furthermore, unemployment effects and increases your potential premium tax credit! The American Rescue Plan exempts up to $10,200 in UI benefits from federal income tax. People who receive UI benefits in 2020 will be able to reduce their adjusted gross income by up to that amount, and so reduce their federal income tax liability.
Please get in touch with me to learn the details on the aforementioned company providing the greatest access to providers and how the expanded subsidies and Cost-Sharing Reductions may improve your health insurance situation.
If you choose to be proactive and would like to do some reconnaissance before calling me for assistance and details, you may click on my quoting link immediately following. When the page opens, ignore the login button. You need not log in. Enter your information. I.e., birth date, zip code, etc. On the next page, click on the top box “SELECT ALL” to clear the selections. Then select “MEDICAL” only, to get started. Otherwise, you will be overwhelmed with options and information. You can always return for dental, etc.)
Click “YES” if you would like to estimate whether you qualify for a subsidy. If so, enter your estimated annual income in 2022 and click “CALCULATE”. It will estimate your subsidy. The estimates are usually accurate to within $3.00. From there, click “NEXT”. You will then see all your plan options and be able to LOOKUP PROVIDERS and see plan details. Or simply call me to do all this for you!
CLICK HERE TO SEE ALL YOUR ACA HEALTH INSURANCE OPTIONS (IF NECESSARY, COPY THE LINK IN YOUR BROWSER AND HIT ENTER):
As the cost for everything, including medical treatment, is going up, so too are Medicare’s premiums and deductibles. As our second feature article below illustrates, the Medicare Part B (outpatient) basic premium is going from $148.50 to $170.10 and it’s calendar year deductible is going from $203.00 to $233.00! You can do the math, but, needless to say, so much for 5% inflation rate projected by the current administration which also does not appear to apply to our cost for gasoline, meat, and energy and food, in general! You’ve already spent the increase in your Social Security Benefit!
The details of how your Medicare Part B basic premium will may titrate upward relative to your income are clearly outlined in Feature Article 2, just published by the Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Lastly, if you are making the decision whether to go with a Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Health Plan vs. a Medicare Supplement policy coupled with a Part D Prescription Drug Plan – please read Feature Article 3 (say it ain’t so, Joe!) below, and carefully weigh your decision.
Again, please contact me for guidance in how to minimize the impact of these changes and maximize your both your access to providers and quality health care. My 35 years specializing in the health and Medicare related insurance industry have provided me insights beyond that of the average agent/broker/generalist; and my clients access to a far greater number of products and solutions.
Advanced Premium Tax Credits(APTC):Lowers the cost of premiums and can be used on any Marketplace plan except for catastrophic plans.
Cost Sharing Reductions(CSR):Lowers the cost of deductibles and can only be applied to Marketplace Silver plans.
This year, many people will qualify for both types of savings!
Why are subsidies more generous this year:
The American Rescue Plan Act increased the amount of APTC and CSR available to a household, and it also expanded the eligibility for these subsidies.
Silver plans vs. other metal levels:
All Marketplace health insurance plans are broken into five types: Platinum, Gold, Silver, Bronze and Catastrophic. You can expect the same level of care fromall metal levels. The difference is how your healthcare costs will be split between you and the insurance company. Metal levels Premium Platinum Highest Gold Silver Bronze Catastrophic Deductible Higher Middle Lower Lowest Lower Middle Higher Highest. If you are eligible for a CSR, you must choose a Silver plan!
On November 12, 2021, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the 2022 premiums, deductibles, and coinsurance amounts for the Medicare Part A and Part B programs, and the 2022 Medicare Part D income-related monthly adjustment amounts.
Medicare Part B Premium and Deductible
Medicare Part B covers physician services, outpatient hospital services, certain home health services, durable medical equipment, and certain other medical and health services not covered by Medicare Part A.
Each year the Medicare Part B premium, deductible, and coinsurance rates are determined according to the Social Security Act. The standard monthly premium for Medicare Part B enrollees will be $170.10 for 2022, an increase of $21.60 from $148.50 in 2021. The annual deductible for all Medicare Part B beneficiaries is $233 in 2022, an increase of $30 from the annual deductible of $203 in 2021.
The increases in the 2022 Medicare Part B premium and deductible are due to:
Rising prices and utilization across the health care system that drive higher premiums year-over-year alongside anticipated increases in the intensity of care provided.
Congressional action to significantly lower the increase in the 2021 Medicare Part B premium, which resulted in the $3.00 per beneficiary per month increase in the Medicare Part B premium (that would have ended in 2021) being continued through 2025.
Additional contingency reserves due to the uncertainty regarding the potential use of the Alzheimer’s drug, Aduhelm™, by people with Medicare. In July 2021, CMS began a National Coverage Determination analysis process to determine whether and how Medicare will cover Aduhelm™ and similar drugs used to treat Alzheimer’s disease. As that process is still underway, there is uncertainty regarding the coverage and use of such drugs by Medicare beneficiaries in 2022. While the outcome of the coverage determination is unknown, our projection in no way implies what the coverage determination will be, however, we must plan for the possibility of coverage for this high cost Alzheimer’s drug which could, if covered, result in significantly higher expenditures for the Medicare program.
Medicare Open Enrollment and Medicare Savings Programs
Medicare Open Enrollment for 2022 began on October 15, 2021, and ends on December 7, 2021. During this time, people eligible for Medicare can compare 2022 coverage options between Original Medicare, and Medicare Advantage, and Part D prescription drug plans. In addition to the recently released premiums and cost sharing information for 2022 Medicare Advantage and Part D plans, the Fee-for-Service Medicare premiums and cost sharing information released today will enable people with Medicare to understand all their Medicare coverage options for the year ahead. Medicare health and drug plan costs and covered benefits can change from year to year, so people with Medicare should look at their coverage choices annually and decide on the options that best meet their health needs.
To help with their Medicare costs, low-income seniors and adults with disabilities may qualify to receive financial assistance from the Medicare Savings Programs (MSPs). The MSPs help millions of Americans access high-quality health care at a reduced cost, yet only about half of eligible people are enrolled. The MSPs help pay Medicare premiums and may also pay Medicare deductibles, coinsurance, and copayments for those who meet the conditions of eligibility. Enrolling in an MSP offers relief from these Medicare costs, allowing people to spend that money on other vital needs, including food, housing, or transportation. People with Medicare interested in learning more can visit: https://www.medicare.gov/your-medicare-costs/get-help-paying-costs/medicare-savings-programs.
Medicare Part B Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amounts
Since 2007, a beneficiary’s Part B monthly premium is based on his or her income. These income-related monthly adjustment amounts affect roughly 7 percent of people with Medicare Part B. The 2022 Part B total premiums for high-income beneficiaries are shown in the following table:
Beneficiaries who file individual tax returns with modified adjusted gross income:
Beneficiaries who file joint tax returns with modified adjusted gross income:
Income-related monthly adjustment amount
Total monthly premium amount
Less than or equal to $91,000
Less than or equal to $182,000
$0.00
$170.10
Greater than $91,000 and less than or equal to $114,000
Greater than $182,000 and less than or equal to $228,000
68.00
238.10
Greater than $114,000 and less than or equal to $142,000
Greater than $228,000 and less than or equal to $284,000
170.10
340.20
Greater than $142,000 and less than or equal to $170,000
Greater than $284,000 and less than or equal to $340,000
272.20
442.30
Greater than $170,000 and less than $500,000
Greater than $340,000 and less than $750,000
374.20
544.30
Greater than or equal to $500,000
Greater than or equal to $750,000
408.20
578.30
Premiums for high-income beneficiaries who are married and lived with their spouse at any time during the taxable year, but file a separate return, are as follows:
Beneficiaries who are married and lived with their spouses at any time during the year, but who file separate tax returns from their spouses, with modified adjusted gross income:
Income-related monthly adjustment amount
Total monthly premium amount
Less than or equal to $91,000
$0.00
$170.10
Greater than $91,000 and less than $409,000
374.20
544.30
Greater than or equal to $409,000
408.20
578.30
Medicare Part A Premium and Deductible
Medicare Part A covers inpatient hospital, skilled nursing facility, hospice, inpatient rehabilitation, and some home health care services. About 99 percent of Medicare beneficiaries do not have a Part A premium since they have at least 40 quarters of Medicare-covered employment.
The Medicare Part A inpatient hospital deductible that beneficiaries pay if admitted to the hospital will be $1,556 in 2022, an increase of $72 from $1,484 in 2021. The Part A inpatient hospital deductible covers beneficiaries’ share of costs for the first 60 days of Medicare-covered inpatient hospital care in a benefit period. In 2022, beneficiaries must pay a coinsurance amount of $389 per day for the 61st through 90th day of a hospitalization ($371 in 2021) in a benefit period and $778 per day for lifetime reserve days ($742 in 2021). For beneficiaries in skilled nursing facilities, the daily coinsurance for days 21 through 100 of extended care services in a benefit period will be $194.50 in 2022 ($185.50 in 2021).
Part A Deductible and Coinsurance Amounts for Calendar Years 2021 and 2022 by Type of Cost Sharing
2021
2022
Inpatient hospital deductible
$1,484
$1,556
Daily coinsurance for 61st-90th Day
$371
$389
Daily coinsurance for lifetime reserve days
$742
$778
Skilled Nursing Facility coinsurance
$185.50
$194.50
Enrollees age 65 and over who have fewer than 40 quarters of coverage and certain persons with disabilities pay a monthly premium in order to voluntarily enroll in Medicare Part A. Individuals who had at least 30 quarters of coverage or were married to someone with at least 30 quarters of coverage may buy into Part A at a reduced monthly premium rate, which will be $274 in 2022, a $15 increase from 2021. Certain uninsured aged individuals who have less than 30 quarters of coverage and certain individuals with disabilities who have exhausted other entitlement will pay the full premium, which will be $499 a month in 2022, a $28 increase from 2021.
Medicare Part D Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amounts
Since 2011, a beneficiary’s Part D monthly premium is based on his or her income. These income-related monthly adjustment amounts affect roughly 8 percent of people with Medicare Part D. These individuals will pay the income-related monthly adjustment amount in addition to their Part D premium. Part D premiums vary from plan to plan and roughly two-thirds are paid directly to the plan, with the remaining deducted from Social Security benefit checks. The Part D income-related monthly adjustment amounts are all deducted from Social Security benefit checks. The 2022 Part D income-related monthly adjustment amounts for high-income beneficiaries are shown in the following table:
Beneficiaries who file individual tax returns with modified adjusted gross income:
Beneficiaries who file joint tax returns with modified adjusted gross income:
Income-related monthly adjustment amount
Less than or equal to $91,000
Less than or equal to $182,000
$0.00
Greater than $91,000 and less than or equal to $114,000
Greater than $182,000 and less than or equal to $228,000
12.40
Greater than $114,000 and less than or equal to $142,000
Greater than $228,000 and less than or equal to $284,000
32.10
Greater than $142,000 and less than or equal to $170,000
Greater than $284,000 and less than or equal to $340,000
51.70
Greater than $170,000 and less than $500,000
Greater than $340,000 and less than $750,000
71.30
Greater than or equal to $500,000
Greater than or equal to $750,000
77.90
Premiums for high-income beneficiaries who are married and lived with their spouse at any time during the taxable year, but file a separate return, are as follows:
Beneficiaries who are married and lived with their spouses at any time during the year, but file separate tax returns from their spouses, with modified adjusted gross income:
Joe Namath may have delivered the New York Jets’ last Super Bowl championship, but the old quarterback is throwing a bunch of bull on his TV commercials for private Medicare plans.
He’s one of a slew of pitchmen and women selling Medicare Advantage plans to the more than 54 million Americans 65 or over eligible for Medicare. That includes more than 100,000 of us in Orange, Ulster and Sullivan counties.
Joe Namath may have delivered the New York Jets’ last Super Bowl championship, but the old quarterback is throwing a bunch of bull on his TV commercials for private Medicare plans.
Those pitches, which also flood our mailboxes during this enrollment period that ends Dec. 7, complicate what can be a mind-boggling array of insurance choices.
First, some basic facts:
Medicare Advantage is the all-in-one alternative to original Medicare health insurance. Original Medicare includes coverage for hospitalization (Part A), medical visits and procedures (Part B) and, at additional cost, prescription drugs (Part D). Before you enroll in Advantage plans, you must have original Medicare, and you still must pay the Part B premium of $148.50 (in 2021). While Medicare Advantage plans include medical, hospital and drug coverage, they can also feature extra benefits not offered by traditional Medicare, such as dental, hearing and vision coverage with no additional premium.
Especially in those pitches from celebrities like Namath, William Shatner and Jimmie Walker, they can also promise everything from free meal delivery to money deposited in your Social Security account.
But …
“Buyer beware,” says Erinn Braun, Orange County Office for the Aging’s Health Insurance Counseling and Assistance Program coordinator. She provided much information for this column.
Pitches like Namath’s can be misleading or downright deceptive, starting with the red, white and blue colors that insinuate the ads are from the government, as do the state logos on some mailers. While the plans themselves are perfectly legal and may be great for many of the 27 million Americans enrolled in them, they often don’t deliver everything those pitches seem to promise. Plus, those pitches don’t come close to telling the full story of the benefits of those plans – many of which aren’t even offered in your area.
For instance:
Unlike original Medicare, which is accepted by virtually all doctors and hospitals, Medicare Advantage plans include a network of doctors and hospitals you must visit to be insured. So if you hear about a great gastroenterologist in New York City and she isn’t in your Advantage plan’s network, your insurance may not cover your visit. Plus, unlike original Medicare, you may need prior approval for coverage of a medical procedure or equipment such as insulin pumps.
And while the dental and vision coverage of Medicare Advantage plans sounds great, some plans in your area may only include routine visits, not more expensive items like dental implants and eyeglasses. Plus, the average yearly coverage limit of Advantage dental plans ranges from about $1,000 to $1,300, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. The dentists and eye doctors you visit must also be in the plan’s networks – meaning your eye doctor or dentist may not accept your plan.
Steve Israel
As for those meals and money Joe Willie is pitching?
Again, buyer beware.
A few Advantage plans may offer meal delivery for the qualified but only one or two plans in your county may offer those benefits. And your doctors or hospital may not accept those plans. Same thing goes for that money Namath says could go into your Social Security account. Not only does that money go toward the required payment for Part B of original Medicare, very few plans – if any – in your area may feature that benefit, and those plans may not include your doctors.
Finally, when you call the number provided by Namath and other pitch folks, you’ll reach a salesperson who’s in business to … you guessed it … sell you a Medicare Advantage plan.
For help selecting the right Medicare plan for you, contact your county’s Office of the Aging. Orange: 845-615-3710, Sullivan: 845-807-0241, Ulster: 845-340-3456. A trusted health insurance agent can also help. Medicare.gov and 1-800-Medicare provide a wealth of information.
Well, here we are, two days from Obamacare Open Enrollment. Tuesday, November 1st, the starting gun goes off for Americans to shop for 2017 health insurance and we cross the finish line January 31st, at which point, our health insurance―barring a significant life change―will be locked in the remainder of the year. This month is my 30th year in the industry and it is my job to help you identify and elect your best health insurance option for 2017.
Here are the challenges ahead of us. As those of you who were in Under Age 65 health insurance market last year well know, you were forced off your PPO plan (assuming you were in one) and into HMO coverage. And you learned it was extremely difficult to find your doctors and hospitals in any HMO plan network. (In an HMO plan, you must utilize providers in your network or you have no coverage whatsoever.) Hence, you found your doctors, hospitals, and, effectively, your treatment rationed. Previews of the 2017 plans and premiums indicate most insurance companies have withdrawn from the market and those remaining are continuing to offer HMO coverage only. To add insult to injury, they are offering it at dramatically higher premiums. In Texas, premiums are 25% higher on average. And they are much higher in many other states.
As I write, plan and premium change notices are arriving in the mail and pushing the edge out of the sticker shock envelope. My own arrived, and while a 23% increase sounds good relative to what many of my clients are experiencing, the insurance company is also raising the deductible on my plan by a thousand dollars. A client left a message in my voicemail late Friday evening informing me his premium is increasing 58.9%. He went on to say, “That is unsustainable and I will pay the penalty before I pay that premium! We will have to find something else!” What he may not know yet―and what I will have to inform him―is that he will only have plans for two companies to choose from in his county. One is the company he is with. Regardless, all the options he will have are at significantly higher premiums than last year. Since 2014 (the first year Americans whose net income fell below a certain threshold were able to receive subsidies to offset a portion of their health insurance premium) I have said―if you qualify for a significant one―you may be happy with your health insurance premium. However, if you are one of the millions of hard working Americans making just above that threshold―in all likelihood―you are, like my client who left the voicemail, distraught over what is happening to your health insurance costs.
That being said, and as was already said, it is my job to help you identify your best option. And to do so without foregoing health insurance protection and paying the ensuing penalty for doing so. The strategy I employed for myself in 2016 is the same I will be utilizing in 2017. It is not what I would prefer, but what I would prefer is not an option. It is, however, the best option in light of the circumstances. Finances may not be your concern but access to your providers may be. Or, access to your providers may not be your concern but finances may be. Both may be your concern. My strategy may work for you or it may not. But I feel it provides the least compromise and is the best for adapting to this current state of affairs. At least until better options avail themselves in the individual and family health insurance market. Please contact me at 281–367–6565 to discuss it. If you feel it, or another approach, is the way you would like to proceed, I can make the application process go as quickly and smoothly as possible. And that is whether you qualify for a subsidy or not and without you having to personally deal with healthcare.gov.
ATTENTION SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS: You have possible recourse regarding the poor options in the individual and family health insurance market. If you are the owner of a legal business entity, e.g., LLC or corporation, you have an alternative. During the Small Business Open Enrollment Period (SBOEP)―from November 1 through December 15th―you may enroll your employer group and still have access to quality coverage and, more importantly, quality PPO provider networks where you are in control of who your providers are and, therefore, your treatment. During this SBOEP you will not have to meet the participation or contribution requirements which apply to small business group enrollment during the remainder of the year. In other words, you need only cover a minimum of two employees and you can require they pay 100% of their personal and family premium which will then be payroll deducted from their compensation. Please contact me if you have an interest in pursuing this strategy.
For those who are strictly in the market for individual and family health insurance, as of Tuesday, you may go to my website at http://TheWoodlandsTXHealthInsurance.com to review your options. While this site focuses on our hometown, it will provide quotes for residents of all 50 states. I can be the agent for residents of Texas, Indiana, Ohio and Michigan. Once there, you may apply online or call me to discuss the details of the options you see and I can submit your application for you. I the meantime (as of this moment), if you know―or believe―you qualify for a subsidy of your premium, you may go to my second quoting site where you may calculate the subsidy you qualify for or the penalty for not purchasing health insurance in 2017. You mag go on to obtain your quote and, if applying, log directly into healthcare.gov and apply. If doing so, when asked if you are working with anyone else on your coverage, select Agent or Broker and list my agent (legal) name, Donald Kenton Henry, and my National Producer Number (NPN) 387509. If you do this, I will be able to assist with any incomplete applications or outstanding requirements. If you become my client, in most cases, I can handle service related issues throughout the year without you having to deal with the personnel at healthcare.gov or an insurance company. The important thing I would like for you to appreciate is – you are charged not one penny more in premium by going through me for your health insurance than if you were to go directly through the front door of the insurance company whose product you wish to acquire and purchased it directly. And I charge no fee for my service. I only hope that, if I introduce you to a product you wish to utilize or a strategy, you wish to employ, you will acquire the product through me as your agent.
I look forward to working with you and to, if becoming your agent, providing you the best of insurance service throughout the year. Again, please call me at 281–367–6565.
The decision by many healthy people not to sign up under the Affordable Care Act, even if it means a tax penalty, is undermining the plan. CreditKaren Bleier/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
WASHINGTON — The architects of the Affordable Care Act thought they had a blunt instrument to force people — even young and healthy ones — to buy insurance through the law’s online marketplaces: a tax penalty for those who remain uninsured.
It has not worked all that well, and that is at least partly to blame for soaring premiums next year on some of the health law’s insurance exchanges.
The full weight of the penalty will not be felt until April, when those who have avoided buying insurance will face penalties of around $700 a person or more. But even then that might not be enough: For the young and healthy who are badly needed to make the exchanges work, it is sometimes cheaper to pay the Internal Revenue Service than an insurance company charging large premiums, with huge deductibles.
“In my experience, the penalty has not been large enough to motivate people to sign up for insurance,” said Christine Speidel, a tax lawyer at Vermont Legal Aid.
Some people do sign up, especially those with low incomes who receive the most generous subsidies, Ms. Speidel said. But others, she said, find that they cannot afford insurance, even with subsidies, so “they grudgingly take the penalty.”
The I.R.S. says that 8.1 million returns included penalty payments for people who went without insurance in 2014, the first year in which most people were required to have coverage. A preliminary report on the latest tax-filing season, tabulating data through April, said that 5.6 million returns included penalties averaging $442 a return for people uninsured in 2015.
With the health law’s fourth open-enrollment season beginning Tuesday, consumers are anxiously weighing their options.
William H. Weber, 51, a business consultant in Atlanta, said he paid $1,400 a month this year for a Humana health plan that covered him and his wife and two children. Premiums will increase 60 percent next year, Mr. Weber said, and he does not see alternative policies that would be less expensive. So he said he was seriously considering dropping insurance and paying the penalty.
“We may roll the dice next year, go without insurance and hope we have no major medical emergencies,” Mr. Weber said. “The penalty would be less than two months of premiums.” (He said that he did not qualify for a subsidy because his income was too high, but that his son, a 20-year-old barista in New York City, had a great plan with a subsidy.)
Iris I. Burnell, the manager of a Jackson Hewitt Tax Service office on Capitol Hill, said she met this week with a client in his late 50s who has several part-time jobs and wants to buy insurance on the exchanges. But, she said, “he’s finding that the costs are prohibitive on a monthly basis, so he has resigned himself to the fact that he will have to suffer the penalty.”
When Congress was writing the Affordable Care Act in 2009 and 2010, lawmakers tried to balance carrots and sticks: subsidies to induce people to buy insurance and tax penalties “to ensure compliance,” in the words of the Senate Finance Committee.
But the requirement for people to carry insurance is one of the most unpopular provisions of the health law, and the Obama administration has been cautious in enforcing it. The I.R.S. portrays the decision to go without insurance as a permissible option, not as a violation of federal law.
The law “requires you and each member of your family to have qualifying health care coverage (called minimum essential coverage), qualify for a coverage exemption, or make an individual shared responsibility payment when you file your federal income tax return,” the tax agency says on its website.
Some consumers who buy insurance on the exchanges still feel vulnerable. Deductibles are so high, they say, that the insurance seems useless. So some think that whether they send hundreds of dollars to the I.R.S. or thousands to an insurance company, they are essentially paying something for nothing.
Obama administration officials say that perception is wrong. Even people with high deductibles have protection against catastrophic costs, they say, and many insurance plans cover common health care services before consumers meet their deductibles. In addition, even when consumers pay most or all of a hospital bill, they often get the benefit of discounts negotiated by their insurers.
The health law authorized certain exemptions from the coverage requirement, and the Obama administration has expanded that list through rules and policy directives. More than 12 million taxpayers claimed one or more coverage exemptions last year because, for instance, they were homeless, had received a shut-off notice from a utility company or were experiencing other hardships.
“The penalty for violating the individual mandate has not been very effective,” said Joseph J. Thorndike, the director of the tax history project at Tax Analysts, a nonprofit publisher of tax information. “If it were effective, we would have higher enrollment, and the population buying policies in the insurance exchange would be healthier and younger.”
Americans have decades of experience with tax deductions and other tax breaks aimed at encouraging various types of behavior, as well as “sin taxes” intended to discourage other kinds of behavior, Mr. Thorndike said. But, he said: “It is highly unusual for the federal government to use tax penalties to encourage affirmative behavior. That’s a hard sell.”
The maximum penalty has been increasing gradually since 2014. Federal officials and insurance counselors who advise consumers have been speaking more explicitly about the penalties, so they could still prove effective.
Many health policy experts say the penalties would be more effective if they were tougher. That argument alarms consumer advocates.
“If you make the penalties tougher, you need to make financial assistance broader and deeper,” said Michael Miller, the policy director of Community Catalyst, a consumer group seeking health care for all.
Clients and Friends of Kenton Henry and ALL PLAN MED QUOTE,
It is that time again. We are approaching the end of the calendar year and I write to thank you for your business and for the trust you placed in me to represent your health insurance needs to the best of my ability. This month marks my 29th year in the industry and that would not be possible without you.
Because there are so many changes coming your way-not only for Medicare recipients but for my Under Age 65 clients-following me here will be the easiest way to be informed of vital information affecting your coverage as it becomes available to me. This is your one source for the good, the bad and the ugly of the Medical insurance market. I will be posting the good part later when I determine what that is. Happy New Year.
BREAKING NEWS FOR MEDICARE RECIPIENTS: On Thursday, October 15, the Social Security Administration announced that there will be no cost of living adjustment (COLA) for 2016. At the same time, the Medicare Part B Premium and deductible is expected to increase significantly for some people next year. The Part B basic premium is expected to go from $104.90 to $159.30 per month Additionally, the Medicare Part B calendar year deductible is slated to also increase from $147 to $223! This latter increase would affect approximately the entire Medicare population of 17 million and will in turn trigger premium increases from the supplemental insurances such as Medicare Supplement and Medicare Advantage which pay that deductible for the insured person! Together, these increases could cause people to drop their Medicare Part B insurance resulting loss of coverage for doctors visits, diagnostic testing, lab work and out-patient surgeries. For more details and information on just who this affects please watch this video of a FOX NEWS LIVE report by Martha MacCallum video I recorded just today:
Additionally, if you are Part D Prescription Drug Plan client of mine (or not) email me a list of your current prescription drug regimen (drug and dosage) and I will scan the market to identify your lowest total of pocket cost plan and make my recommendation. allplanhealthinsurance.com@gmail.com
UNDER AGE 65 INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY NEWS:
Most relevant at this time for individuals and families under the age of 65 is the elimination of BlueCross BlueShield of Texas’s “Individual and Family” Blue Choice PPO network which over 370,000, insured members (including myself) utilize. I informed all my clients (sharing this coverage) in a letter mailed via the US Postal Service just a few days ago. I also addressed this issue in my latest blog post entitled “BlueCross BlueShield of Texas Tells Clients ‘Say Good–Bye To Your PPO Plan’”. (The more sarcastic side of me considered entitling it, “Take A Bite Of This Sandwich” but my more professional self intervened.)In the letter and post,I informed those who have HMO coverage their policy would not be affected other than an anticipated rate increase. It turns out that is not the case as I was just informed that many who have HMO coverage will also have to select another version. And so it seems that, with my assistance, many of you will be seeking alternative coverage for 2016.
This begs the question: What will our options be with other insurance companies? Unfortunately, like BlueCross, most companies are yet to reveal the details of their policies. Within the next few days, I hope to have a quoting link available to you from which-in the very near future-you will be able to obtain all your 2016 options, subsidy or no subsidy, on or off the Federal Marketplace otherwise known as Healthcare.gov. Regardless, I will be introduced to these changes over the remainder of October and these, along with the quoting link, will be posted on my blog in real time. Rest assured―whatever your best options are for 2016―I will have them. And you will be able to elect them with the beginning of OPEN ENROLLMENT (OE) November 1st―through the end January 31st.
Do not hesitate to call me as we prepare for these changes. And to assure you will be informed of the latest information relative to your coverage – please click “follow” on my blog as I post all coverage changes and preview the options you will have.
If you are currently a client—thanks once again for your business. It is greatly appreciated as will readership of healthandmedicareinsurance.com!
healthandmedicareinsurance.com 
Leave a comment